Rejecting the notion of Most Important Programming Language

#Blog #Article #Opinion #Programming

In my recent exploration of programming tutorials, I stumbled upon a thought-provoking video on David Bombal's channel. The video, titled "Free Complete Course: You need to learn this programming language to be a senior developer!" featuring Dr. Chuck, sparked a riveting discussion about the universal importance of a particular programming language, particularly C.

I want to be upfront about my perspective: the importance of things, including programming languages, is inherently subjective and relative. This viewpoint extends beyond the realm of coding to encompass various facets of life. It's rooted in the understanding that evaluations are not inherent properties of objects but rather subjective information held by the individuals or groups making those assessments.

The video boldly declares that C is universally the 'most important' language and a prerequisite for achieving senior developer status. However, my perspective challenges this assertion, recognizing the subjectivity of importance. The significance of a programming language is intricately tied to the goals, context, and preferences of the developer or group involved.

Embracing subjectivity, the choice of learning C or any other programming language should be guided by the concrete requirements of a project and the principles deemed important by the individual or team. Subjectivity lies in acknowledging that the importance of a programming language is contingent on a set of criteria established by the subject engaging with it.

As I reflect on the video's key points, my goal is to shed light on the subjective nature of programming language importance (as the rest of the things). I invite you to explore if the path to senior developer status truly depends on mastering a specific language or if success lies in adopting a tailored, context-driven approach.